greytHR vs factoHR: Which HRMS Is Right for You? (2026)

greytHR and factoHR are both built with Indian payroll compliance as a genuine priority, which makes this a closer comparison than most — the real differences show up in pricing structure and how each handles add-on features.

Pricing and feature details below reflect each vendor's publicly listed information at the time of writing. Vendor pricing changes — confirm current numbers directly with each vendor before deciding.

Pricing model

greytHR publishes Essential (₹2,495/month base for 50 employees, ₹45/additional employee) and Growth (₹4,495/month base, ₹85/additional employee), plus a free Starter tier up to 25 employees and a custom-quoted Premium tier.

factoHR publishes a free plan for up to 20 employees, then Core, Premium, and Ultimate tiers starting around ₹4,499/month for up to 50 employees, with additional employees billed per head (roughly ₹69-₹129 depending on tier, at time of writing).

Where the two diverge on structure

greytHR gates shift management, overtime, and geo-fencing behind its Growth tier — meaning needing any one of these roughly doubles your per-employee incremental rate compared to Essential. factoHR takes a more granular add-on approach — features like selfie punch, face recognition, recruitment, and timesheets are priced as small separate add-ons on top of a base tier, rather than requiring a full tier upgrade for one feature.

Feature depth comparison

Both platforms cover core Indian statutory compliance (PF, ESI, PT, TDS) with automatic rate updates. factoHR's published feature set specifically highlights Form 16 generation, gratuity and bonus calculation, and a strong mobile ESS app with GPS/selfie-based attendance. greytHR's published feature set emphasizes broader statutory coverage including Gratuity Act and Maternity Benefit Act compliance specifically, with a helpdesk feature included even at the entry tier.

Who each is generally better suited for

If you need one or two specific advanced features (geo-fencing alone, say) without paying for a full tier upgrade, factoHR's granular add-on model may work out more cost-effective. If you're likely to need most of a higher tier's functionality together, greytHR's Growth tier bundling may be simpler and comparably priced.

Where PeopleVio fits in this comparison

PeopleVio includes geo-fenced attendance, shift management, and full statutory compliance (PF, ESI, multi-state PT, TDS, Form 16) as standard functionality within its single per-employee price (₹59/month, ₹49 billed annually) — without gating individual features behind tier upgrades or per-feature add-on charges.

Frequently asked questions

Is greytHR's Growth tier a better deal than factoHR's per-feature add-ons if I need several advanced features? Often yes, if you need multiple advanced features together — a single tier upgrade covering several features can be more cost-effective than accumulating several individual add-ons, worth actually calculating for your specific feature needs.

Does factoHR's free tier include statutory compliance filing? Published information indicates factoHR's free tier covers basic employee data and payslip generation for up to 20 employees — confirm whether full statutory filing automation is included at that tier or requires a paid upgrade before relying on it.

Which platform has stronger mobile self-service specifically? factoHR's published materials place particular emphasis on mobile ESS (GPS/selfie punch, leave/travel/expense requests from the app) — worth testing both directly if mobile-first employee experience is a priority.

Is one platform meaningfully cheaper than the other at 100 employees? Depends on which specific features you need — run both vendors' published per-employee math against your exact requirements rather than assuming either is uniformly cheaper.

The bottom line

greytHR and factoHR both take Indian compliance seriously but structure pricing differently — greytHR with tier-gated feature bundles, factoHR with granular per-feature add-ons. Which is more cost-effective depends entirely on how many advanced features you actually need together.